4.1 Article

Significance of metacognitive skills in laparoscopic surgery assessed by essential task simulation

Journal

MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 23, Issue 3-4, Pages 165-172

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2013.867273

Keywords

Clinical skills; laparoscopic surgery; training; virtual reality simulator; metacognitive skills

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Medicine, Kyushu University
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26108010, 21103001] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Metacognition is the knowledge about one's own methods of perceiving, remembering, thinking, and acting. This study determined the significance of metacognitive skills in laparoscopic surgery with the aim of applying the findings in a laparoscopic surgery training program. Material and methods: Eighteen medical students with no experience in laparoscopic surgery (novice group) and eight expert surgeons who had each performed >100 laparoscopic surgeries (expert group) were enrolled. The examinees in each group performed an evaluation task using a virtual reality simulator and answered questions about the task. Results: The longest performance times, longest path lengths, and most frequent tissue damage occurred at 135 in the novice group and at 180 in the expert group. The greatest recognition of task difficulties, impatience, and irritation occurred at 135 in the novice group and at 1800 in the expert group. There were statistically significant correlation coefficients between the instrument path length and task difficulty (metacognition) at 135 degrees (R = 0.74, p = 0.03) and 180 degrees (R = 0.79, p = 0.02) in the expert group, but there were no significant correlations in the novice group. Conclusion: We elucidated the significance of metacognitive skills in laparoscopic surgery. A training program should include recognition feedback systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available