4.2 Article

Pre-Variscan evolution of the Western Tatra Mountains: new insights from U-Pb zircon dating

Journal

MINERALOGY AND PETROLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 1-4, Pages 99-115

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00710-011-0176-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Sciences and Higher Education [2 P04D 003 29]
  2. Austrian Science Fund FWF [267-N11, P18202-N10]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P18202] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In situ LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon geochronology combined with cathodoluminescence imaging were carried out to determine protolith and metamorphic ages of orthogneisses from the Western Tatra Mountains (Central Western Carpathians). The metamorphic complex is subdivided into two units (the Lower Unit and the Upper Unit). Orthogneisses of the Lower Unit are mostly banded, fine- to medium-grained rocks while in the Upper Unit varieties with augen structures predominate. Orthogneisses show a dynamically recrystallised mineral assemblage of Qz+Pl+Bt +/- Grt with accessory zircon and apatite. They are peraluminous (ASI=1.20-1.27) and interpreted to belong to a high-K calc-alkaline suite of a VAG-type tectonic setting. LA-MC-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon data from samples from both units, from crystals with oscillatory zoning and Th/U>0.1, yield similar concordia ages of ca. 534Ma. This is interpreted to reflect the magmatic crystallization age of igneous precursors. These oldest meta-magmatics so far dated in the Western Tatra Mountains could be linked to the fragmentation of the northern margin of Gondwana. In zircons from a gneiss from the Upper Unit, cores with well-developed oscillatory zoning are surrounded by weakly luminescent, low contrast rims (Th/U<0.1). These yield a concordia age of ca. 387 Ma corresponding to a subsequent, Eo-Variscan, high-grade metamorphic event, connected with the formation of crustal-scale nappe structures and collision-related magmatism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available