4.3 Article

Diffusion in diamond. II. High-pressure-temperature experiments

Journal

MINERALOGICAL MAGAZINE
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 201-204

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1180/minmag.2009.073.2.201

Keywords

diamonds; diffusion coefficents; high-P-T experiments; Earth's mantle

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NER/H/S/1998/00008, NER/A/S/2003/00368]
  2. NERC [IMF010001] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [IMF010001] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-pressure-temperature (P-T) experiments were conducted in an attempt to determine the diffusion rates of C atoms in diamond, and the possibility of changes in the isotope compositions of diamond at high P-T in the Earth's mantle. The starting material consisted of a polished plate of natural diamond (very largely (12)C), which had been coated with (13)C diamond by chemical-vapour deposition to form a sharp interface between (12)C and (13)C diamond. Three experiments were performed at 1800, 2000 and 2300 degrees C, all at 7.7 GPa, for 0.5-20 h. Isotopic profiles obtained by ion microprobe before and after each experiment showed no evidence of relaxation of the sharp interface between (12)C, and (13)C, and So diffusion Must have been on a scale less than the similar to 32 nm depth resolution for this technique. Using 32 nm as the maximum length scale of diffusion across the interface, the maximum In D (diffusion coefficient) values for the experiments were calculated to be in the range -38 to -42. Unlike previous experimental data, these results Show that changes in the isotopic compositions of diamond oil long time scales ill the Earth's upper mantle are unlikely. Furthermore, the results support empirical evidence from mapping of C isotope distributions in natural diamonds that C isotope compositions reflect diamond growth compositions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available