Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States and the Netherlands: A Tale of Two Countries
Published 2012 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States and the Netherlands: A Tale of Two Countries
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
MILBANK QUARTERLY
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 5-37
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2012-03-19
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00652.x
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 109: Cervical Cytology Screening
- (2014) OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Specialty Differences in Primary Care Physician Reports of Papanicolaou Test Screening Practices: A National Survey, 2006 to 2007
- (2013) K. Robin Yabroff et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests screening interval recommendations in the United States
- (2011) Katherine B. Roland et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Cancer Screening Practices Among Physicians in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
- (2011) Vicki B. Benard et al. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
- Abuses in Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing
- (2011) Philip E. Castle OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Low-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing and Other Nonrecommended Human Papillomavirus Testing Practices Among U.S. Health Care Providers
- (2011) Jennifer Wai-Yin Lee et al. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Cervical Cancer Screening With Both Human Papillomavirus and Papanicolaou Testing vs Papanicolaou Testing Alone
- (2010) Mona Saraiya ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States
- (2010) Judith Swan et al. CANCER
- Meeting the cervical cancer screening needs of underserved women: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2004–2006
- (2010) Florence K. L. Tangka et al. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
- Understanding Differences in the Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2010) Thomas F. Imperiale et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- How Medicare Could Use Comparative Effectiveness Research In Deciding On New Coverage And Reimbursement
- (2010) Steven D. Pearson et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries
- (2010) Emily C Dowling et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
- Comparative Effectiveness and Health Care Spending — Implications for Reform
- (2010) Milton C. Weinstein et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- US physicians' intentions regarding impact of human papillomavirus vaccine on cervical cancer screening
- (2010) Charlene Wong et al. Sexual Health
- Cervical cancer screening policies and coverage in Europe
- (2009) Ahti Anttila et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Age-dependent prevalence of 14 high-risk HPV types in the Netherlands: implications for prophylactic vaccination and screening
- (2008) V M H Coupé et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Accuracy of self-reports of Pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysis
- (2008) Michelle Howard et al. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
- No increased risk for cervical cancer after a broader definition of a negative Pap smear
- (2008) Matejka Rebolj et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Does Patient Health and Hysterectomy Status Influence Cervical Cancer Screening in Older Women?
- (2008) Helen I. Meissner et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Waste in the U.S. Health Care System: A Conceptual Framework
- (2008) TANYA G.K. BENTLEY et al. MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Does Preventive Care Save Money? Health Economics and the Presidential Candidates
- (2008) Joshua T. Cohen et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Cost analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
- (2007) Donatus U. Ekwueme et al. CANCER
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started