4.4 Article

The fabrication of aspherical microlenses using focused ion-beam techniques

Journal

MICRON
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 56-66

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2013.10.013

Keywords

Aspheric micro-lenses; Micro-fabrication; Focused ion beam lithography; Chemical etching

Categories

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D032210/1, EP/I500456/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/D032210/1, EP/I500456/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aspheric lenses are the most common method for correcting for spherical aberrations but, in microlens production, highly-controlled lens profiles are hard to achieve. We demonstrate a technique for creating bespoke, highly-accurate aspheric or spherical profile silicon microlens moulds, of almost any footprint, using focused ion-beam milling. Along with this, we present a method of removing induced ion-beam damage in silicon, via a hydrofluoric acid etch, helping to recover the surface's optical and chemical properties. In this paper, we demonstrate that our milled and etched moulds have a roughness of 4.0-4.1 nm, meaning they scatter less than 1% of light, down to wavelengths of 51 nm, showing that the moulds are suitable to make lenses that are able to handle light from UV up to infra-red. Using empirical experiments and computer simulations, we show that increasing the ion-dose when milling increases the amount of gallium a hydrofluoric acid etch can remove, by increasing the degree of amorphisation within the surface. For doses above 3000 mu C/cm(2) this restores previous surface properties, reducing adhesion to the mould, allowing for a cleaner release and enabling higher quality lenses to be made. Our technique is used to make aspheric microlenses of down to 3 mu m in size, but with a potential to make lenses smaller than 1 mu m. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available