4.4 Review

Effects of risedronate in a rat model of osteopenia due to orchidectomy and disuse: Densitometric, histomorphometric and microtomographic studies

Journal

MICRON
Volume 39, Issue 7, Pages 998-1007

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2007.09.006

Keywords

osteoporosis; orchidectomy; disuse; risedronate; DXA; bone histomorphometry; MicroCT

Categories

Funding

  1. Pays de la Loire - Axe Biomateriaux and INSERM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), histomorphometry and X-ray microtomography (microCT) were used to assess effects of risedronate and testosterone in a combined rat model of orchidectomy (ORX) and local paralysis induced by botulinum neurotoxin (BTX). Four groups of mature rats were studied for I month: SHAM operated ORX and right hindlimb immobilization (BTX) ORX + BTX + risedronate or testosterone. Changes in bone and body composition were measured by DXA (BMC, lean and fat mass), histomorphometry (BV/TV2D, Tb.Th and microarchitectural parameters) and microCT (BV/TV3D, SMI and cortical parameters). ORX and BTX had additive effects on bone loss since differences were maximized on the immobilized bone. The decrease in BMC on the tibial metaphysis reached -33.6% vs. - 11.3% in the nonimmobilized limb. BV/TV and Tb.N decreased and Th.Sp increased in both hindlimbs whereas Tb.Th was sipificantly lower only in the immobilized limb. Decrease of tibial cortical area and thickness was greater in the immobilized limb. Risedronate prevented BMC, BV/TV and architecture loss but not reduction in Th.Th. Cortical bone was preserved only in the non-immobilized limb. Testosterone was unable to prevent trabecular and cortical bone loss, but it prevents loss of whole body lean mass. In conclusion, ORX and BTX resulted in additive effects on bone loss. Risedronate had protective effects on trabecular bone loss but was less effective on cortical bone. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available