4.5 Article

Critical conditions and breakup of non-squashed microconfined droplets: effects of fluid viscoelasticity

Journal

MICROFLUIDICS AND NANOFLUIDICS
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 1153-1163

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-010-0743-8

Keywords

Droplet breakup; Confinement; Viscoelasticity; Grace curve; Critical capillary number; Critical droplet length

Funding

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO)
  2. Onderzoeksfonds K.U. Leuven [GOA09/002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Droplet breakup in systems with either a viscoelastic matrix or a viscoelastic droplet is studied microscopically in bulk and confined shear flow, using a parallel plate counter rotating shear flow cell. The ratio of droplet diameter to gap spacing is systematically varied between 0.1 and 0.85. In bulk shear flow, the effects of matrix and droplet viscoelasticity on the critical capillary number for breakup are very moderate under the studied conditions. However, in confined conditions a profoundly different behaviour is observed: the critical capillary numbers of a viscoelastic droplet are similar to those of a Newtonian droplet, whereas matrix viscoelasticity causes breakup at a much lower capillary number. The critical capillary numbers are compared with the predictions of a phenomenological model by Minale et al. (Langmuir 26:126-132, 2010); the model results are in qualitative disagreement with the experimental data. It is also found that the critical dimensionless droplet length, the critical capillary number, and the dimensionless droplet length at breakup show a similar dependency on confinement ratio. As a result, confined droplets in a viscoelastic matrix have a smaller dimensionless length at breakup than droplets in a Newtonian matrix, which affects the breakup mode. Whereas confined droplets in a Newtonian matrix can break up into multiple parts, only two daughter droplets are obtained after breakup in a viscoelastic matrix, up to very large confinement ratios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available