4.7 Article

Time resolved sulphur and nutrient distribution in Norway spruce drill cores using ICP-OES

Journal

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 165, Issue 1-2, Pages 79-89

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-008-0101-7

Keywords

Norway spruce; Tree ring; Sulphur; Trace elements; Oxygen bomb combustion; Microwave digestion; ICP-OES; Plant certified reference material

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods were developed for detailed dendrochemical studies of low sulphur contents in Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.). This tree species is the dominant conifer species in Northern and Central Europe and therefore predestined for a possible use as an environmental archive. Two independent digestion procedures were investigated with respect to their suitability for element determination and optimised for analysis of the low sulphur content in wood. A modified oxygen bomb combustion procedure and a microwave acid digestion procedure were evaluated with the goal to obtain sufficient detection limits in order to access low concentrated non-metals with an appropriate time resolution. Method development included evaluation of strategies preventing losses of volatile sulphur species. Digestion efficiency was demonstrated by recovery rates for various certified plant standard reference materials (NIST 1572, NIST 1547, RM 8436, BCR 101, NIST 1515, RM 8436, NIST 1573, NIST 1575) as well as self prepared standards with defined low sulphur content of 20 to 200 mg kg(-1), which are typical for Norway spruce wood samples. Ultra sonic nebulisation (USN) was evaluated with respect to signal enhancement for sample introduction to inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The optimised procedure was applied to Norway spruce drill cores from locations with different environmental conditions in Switzerland, in order to investigate the anthropogenic impact of sulphur and the suitability of Norway spruce as an environmental archive for sulphur.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available