4.7 Article

A SDME/GC-MS methodology for determination of organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in water

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages 303-308

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2011.05.019

Keywords

Single-drop microextraction; SDME; GC-MS; Pesticides

Funding

  1. CNPq/FAPESB PRONEX
  2. CAPES
  3. FINEP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid and simultaneous method for identification and quantification of pesticides residues in water samples have been developed and applied to the analysis of real samples. Tap and San Francisco River water samples were collected from Propria town and Aracaju city in the state of Sergipe, Brazil. A new single-drop microextraction (SDME) followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques were used to determine the dimethoate, methyl parathion, ethion (organophosphates) and permethrin (pyrethroid) pesticides in water samples. The parameters linearity, linear range, precision, accuracy, sensitivity and robustness were studied for validation of the SDME/GC-MS method. An important point to this study is that plots of relative response and logarithmic concentrations were used to verify that the measurements were within the linear dynamic range of the method. In order to enhance high linearity of analytical curve, points that do not belong to 95 to 105% of linear range were excluded. Recovery tests of pesticides in different water samples (tap water and river water) were between 76.2 and 107% and this evaluation was used to demonstrate the reliability of the method. For all pesticides the method showed the limits of detection (LOD) in a range between 0.05 and 0.38 mu g L-1 and the limit of quantification (LOQ) between 0.15 and 1.1 mu g L-1. All these parameters demonstrate high sensitivity of the developed method and the capability for detecting and quantifying of low levels of pesticides in water samples. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available