4.7 Article

GC-MS method for the determination of paraben preservatives in the human breast cancerous tissue

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 391-396

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2010.07.005

Keywords

PPCPs; Paraben; MSTFA; GC-MS; Cancerous tissue

Funding

  1. University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The general presumption that the preservative laden personal care products may be one of the causative agents for breast cancer, has remained a matter of controversy during this decade. Extensive studies have not been carried out to either prove or disprove the role of preservatives in breast cancer incidences. In this study we have developed a new method for the identification and quantification of the preservatives such as methyl paraben (MeP), ethyl paraben (EtP), propyl paraben (PrP) and butyl paraben (BuP) in breast tissue using Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). Tissue was extracted by using acetone:n-hexane mixture (1:1 v/v) and derivatized with N-Methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA). The extent of reaction time and the amount of MSTFA to attain greater derivatization were optimized. The developed method yielded good recovery (mean +/- SD) of 99.8 +/- 5.1, 96 +/- 4.4, 107 +/- 17 and 113 +/- 13% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 5.1, 4.6, 15.6 and 13%, and the limits of detection (LOD) of 2.02, 1.05, 1.71 and 3.75 ng g(-1) for MeP, EtP, PrP and BuP, respectively. The method was successfully validated for the determination of parabens including butyl paraben (log K-ow = 3.57) in cancerous breast tissues; this could be a promising one for screening of breast tissues and also the environment for paraben residues. As far as our knowledge goes this is the first GC-MS method for the determination of parabens in human tissue. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available