4.7 Article

Thermal conductivity measurement of thermochemical storage materials

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 916-926

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.077

Keywords

Thermal conductivity; Salt hydrates; Porous material; DSC; Guarded hot cartridge; Energy storage

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund
  2. Federal State of Lower Saxony [2007DE161PR001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermal properties related to heat and mass transfer are crucial when designing thermochemical heat storage systems. Therefore, enhancing this phenomenon lies in the thermal conductivity of the used material. The effective thermal conductivity of salt hydrates and host matrices is measured using two different methods by differential scanning calorimeter from 100 to 200 degrees C and radial flow apparatus called guarded hot cartridge from 20 to 70 degrees C, where the method effect is less than 12%. On this latter, the results as function of temperature was modelled and theoretical correlation of effective thermal conductivity of the material bed presented. Four inorganic salts often used in thermochemical energy storage (CaCl2, MgCl2, SrBr2 and MgSO4) and host matrices (activated carbon, expanded natural graphite and silica gel) were used as samples and the results on both systems for only salts give a thermal conductivity in the range of 0.3-1.3 W m(-1) K-1 with measurement uncertainty less than 14%. These obtained data are satisfactory with literature values. Regarding the results, the need of composite design is mandatory to achieve great thermal performances in thermal storage systems, especially in closed systems. The presented results can be used for the evaluation and the improvement of heat and mass transfer in thermochemical and sorption heat storage systems. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available