4.7 Article

Laminar forced convection of a nanofluid in a microchannel: Effect of flow inertia and external forces on heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 326-338

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.12.069

Keywords

Laminar forced convection; Nanofluid; Thermophoresis; Brownian motion; Heated microchannel; Two phase lattice Boltzmann method (LBM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multi-phase Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) is used to explore some unprecedented aspects of laminar forced convection in a bottom heated rectangular microchannel. Important physical parameters, such as forces exerted on fluid parcels as well as on the dispersed nanoparticle phase are studied, in an attempt to elucidate the mechanism that results in establishment of a relative velocity between nanoparticles and the continuous fluid phase (slip velocity). The significance of the external forces, such as the gravitational, thermophoresis and Brownian forces is investigated. A recently established expression for the estimation of thermophoresis force in nanofluids is employed to study the true effect of thermophoresis, as other studies either neglect this effect, or are parametric or employ expressions that overestimate this effect. The results indicate that in laminar forced convection, the Brownian force has a significant effect on flow and heat transfer characteristics for low Re number flows (Re similar to 1-10), but thermophoresis may be safely neglected for all flow conditions. At low Re number flows, the nanofluid flow is heterogeneous, and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluid compared to the base fluid, such as Nu and convection heat transfer coefficient, significantly increase, while at higher Re numbers, such as Re = 100, flow behaves homogeneously and therefore the application of a nanofluid may not be justified. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available