4.4 Article

XAS studies of Se speciation in selenite-fed rats

Journal

METALLOMICS
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages 2193-2203

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4mt00227j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  2. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources, Biomedical Technology Program [P41RR001209]
  3. International Synchrotron Access Program (ISAP)
  4. Australian Government
  5. Australian Research Council [DP0985807]
  6. Australian Synchrotron Postgraduate Award
  7. Australian Research Council [DP0985807] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biological activity of selenium is dependent on its chemical form. Therefore, knowledge of Se chemistry in vivo is required for efficacious use of selenium compounds in disease prevention and treatment. Using X-ray absorption spectroscopy, Se speciation in the kidney, liver, heart, spleen, testis and red blood cells of rats fed control (similar to 0.3 ppm Se) or selenite-supplemented (1 ppm or 5 ppm Se) diets for 3 or 6 weeks, was investigated. X-ray absorption spectroscopy revealed the presence of Se-Se and Se-C species in the kidney and liver, and Se-S species in the kidney, but not the liver. X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra showed that there was variation in speciation in the liver and kidneys, but Se speciation was much more uniform in the remaining organs. Using principal component analysis (PCA) to interpret the Se K-edge X-ray absorption spectra, we were able to directly compare the speciation of Se in two different models of selenite metabolism - human lung cancer cells and rat tissues. The effects of Se dose, tissue type and duration of diet on selenium speciation in rat tissues were investigated, and a relationship between the duration of the diet (3 weeks versus 6 weeks) and selenium speciation was observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available