Is it sensible to “deform” dose? 3D experimental validation of dose-warping
Published 2012 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Is it sensible to “deform” dose? 3D experimental validation of dose-warping
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages 5065-5072
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2012-07-28
DOI
10.1118/1.4736534
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Development of a deformable lung phantom for the evaluation of deformable registration
- (2017) Jina Chang et al. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
- A novel methodology for 3D deformable dosimetry
- (2012) U. J. Yeo et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation
- (2012) Carolyn J. Niu et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- A contemporary review of stereotactic radiotherapy: Inherent dosimetric complexities and the potential for detriment
- (2011) Michael L. Taylor et al. ACTA ONCOLOGICA
- EPSM-ABEC 2011 Conference
- (2011) AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE
- Investigation of voxel warping and energy mapping approaches for fast 4D Monte Carlo dose calculations in deformed geometries using VMC++
- (2011) Emily Heath et al. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
- The ArcCHECK diode array for dosimetric verification of HybridArc
- (2011) A L Petoukhova et al. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
- Interfraction Liver Shape Variability and Impact on GTV Position During Liver Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using Abdominal Compression
- (2010) Cynthia L. Eccles et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
- Technical Note:DIRART- A software suite for deformable image registration and adaptive radiotherapy research
- (2010) Deshan Yang et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- 4D dose-position verification in radiation therapy using the RADPOS system in a deformable lung phantom
- (2010) Amanda Cherpak et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- The effective atomic number of dosimetric gels
- (2009) M. L. Taylor et al. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE
- A Comparative Study of the Effect of Calibration Conditions on the Water Equivalence of a Range of Gel Dosimeters
- (2009) M. L. Taylor et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE
- Characterization of Pancreatic Tumor Motion Using Cine MRI: Surrogates for Tumor Position Should Be Used With Caution
- (2009) Mary Feng et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
- Evaluation of nonrigid registration models for interfraction dose accumulation in radiotherapy
- (2009) Guillaume Janssens et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119
- (2009) Gary A. Ezzell et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- Establishing action levels for EPID-based QA for IMRT
- (2008) Rebecca M. Howell et al. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
- A deformable phantom for 4D radiotherapy verification: Design and image registration evaluation
- (2008) Monica Serban et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- An energy transfer method for 4D Monte Carlo dose calculation
- (2008) Jeffrey V. Siebers et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: A multi-institution study
- (2008) Rojano Kashani et al. MEDICAL PHYSICS
- Variation in target and rectum dose due to prostate deformation: an assessment by repeated MR imaging and treatment planning
- (2008) E M Kerkhof et al. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
- Electron Interaction with Gel Dosimeters: Effective Atomic Numbers for Collisional, Radiative and Total Interaction Processes
- (2008) M. L. Taylor et al. RADIATION RESEARCH
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started