4.6 Article

Contrast detection in fluid-saturated media with magnetic resonance poroelastography

Journal

MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 3518-3526

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1118/1.3443563

Keywords

MR poroelastography; poroelasticity; mechanical modeling; finite element method

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA080139-09, P01 CA080139] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB004632, R01 EB004632-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Recent interest in the poroelastic behavior of tissues has led to the development of magnetic resonance poroelastography (MRPE) as an alternative to single-phase MR elastographic image reconstruction. In addition to the elastic parameters (i. e., Lame's constants) commonly associated with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), MRPE enables estimation of the time-harmonic pore-pressure field induced by external mechanical vibration. Methods: This study presents numerical simulations that demonstrate the sensitivity of the computed displacement and pore-pressure fields to a priori estimates of the experimentally derived model parameters. In addition, experimental data collected in three poroelastic phantoms are used to assess the quantitative accuracy of MR poroelastographic imaging through comparisons with both quasistatic and dynamic mechanical tests. Results: The results indicate hydraulic conductivity to be the dominant parameter influencing the deformation behavior of poroelastic media under conditions applied during MRE. MRPE estimation of the matrix shear modulus was bracketed by the values determined from independent quasistatic and dynamic mechanical measurements as expected, whereas the contrast ratios for embedded inclusions were quantitatively similar (10%-15% difference between the reconstructed images and the mechanical tests). Conclusions: The findings suggest that the addition of hydraulic conductivity and a viscoelastic solid component as parameters in the reconstruction may be warranted. (C) 2010 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3443563]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available