4.4 Article

Prognostic value of expression of EGFR and nm23 for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Journal

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 263-271

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-010-9782-y

Keywords

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Epidermal growth factor receptor; nm23; Prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of expression of EGFR and nm23 in patients with advanced-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The study population comprised 127 patients with stage III-IVa NPC with sufficient pretreatment tumor biopsy specimens from 2003 to 2004 and clinical follow-up data. The expression of EGFR and nm23 was detected by immunohistochemistry. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. The correlation between pretreatment expression of EGFR and nm23, and the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy was analyzed. The EGFR expression was correlated with primary lesion stage and clinical stage (P = 0.001, 0.002, respectively). There was a statistically significant association between nm23 expression and local lymph node stage (P = 0.000). The positive EGFR expression had a higher recurrent rate than the negative (P = 0.015). The positive nm23 expression had a lower distant metastasis rate than the negative (P = 0.021). Negative expression of EGFR had a significantly better 5-year OS and DFS than positive expression (P = 0.015, 0.013, respectively). Positive expression of nm23 had a significantly higher 5-year OS and DFS than negative expression (P = 0.001, 0.006, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that both pretreatment EGFR and nm23 expression were strong independent factors for the overall survival of patients with NPC (P = 0.000, 0.000, respectively). Our data suggested that EGFR and nm23 can serve as reliable biomarkers for prognosis prediction in patients with NPC who may benefit from alternate treatment strategy and targeted treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available