4.4 Article

Influence of abutment design on the success of immediately loaded dental implants: Experimental and numerical studies

Journal

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 817-825

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.09.023

Keywords

Fine threads; Cervical region; Abutment design; Immediate loading

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to investigate experimentally and numerically the influence of a fine threaded-against a roughened-cervical region of immediately loaded dental implants in combination with straight and 20 degrees-angled abutments on the implant primary stability. A total of 30 implants were inserted in bovine rib-segments, 14 cervically roughened implants and 16 implants with fine cervical threads. Each implant system received two abutments, straight and 20 degrees-angled. Implant displacements and rotations were measured using a biomechanical measurement system. Subsequently, eight samples were selected for geometrical reconstruction and numerical investigation of stress and strain distributions in the bone by means of the finite element method. Experimentally, both implant systems showed similar behaviour with the straight abutments concerning displacements and rotations. However, fine threaded implants showed much less displacement and rotation against roughened implants when angled abutments were considered. Numerically, stresses were within 35-45 MPa in the cortical bone for both implant systems. The strains showed highest values within the spongious bone with the roughened implants connected to angled abutments. The results indicate that implants with fine cervical threads could be recommended in particular with angled abutments. The outcomes of this study are currently confirmed by long-term clinical investigations. (c) 2011 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available