4.4 Article

Validation of an accelerometer-based method to measure the use of manual wheelchairs

Journal

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 781-786

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.05.009

Keywords

Wheelchair; Monitoring; Data logging; Activity; Validation; Accelerometer; Rehabilitation; Activities of daily living

Funding

  1. Mobility Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center
  2. NIDRR [H133E030035]
  3. NSF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this project was to develop and validate a methodology for measuring manual wheelchair movement. The ability to study wheelchair movement is necessary across a number of clinical and research topics in rehabilitation, including the outcomes of rehabilitation interventions, the long-term effects of wheelchair propulsion on shoulder health, and improved wheelchair prescription and design. This study used a wheel-mounted accelerometer to continuously measure distance wheeled, and to continuously determine if the wheelchair is moving. Validation of the system and algorithm was tested across typical mobility-related activities of daily living, which included short slow movements with frequent starts, stops, and turns, and straight, steady state propulsion. Accuracy was found to be greater than 90% across wheelchair and wheel types (spoke and mag), propulsion techniques (manual and foot), speeds, and everyday mobility-related activities of daily living. Although a number of approaches for wheelchair monitoring are currently present in the literature, many are limited in the data they provide. The methodology presented in this paper can be applied to a variety of commercially available products that record bi-axial accelerations, and used to answer many research questions in wheeled mobility. (C) 2012 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available