4.4 Review

Mechanical models of the cellular cytoskeletal network for the analysis of intracellular mechanical properties and force distributions: A review

Journal

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
Volume 34, Issue 10, Pages 1375-1386

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.08.007

Keywords

Cytoskeleton; Simulation model; Mechanical properties; Prestress; Cell behaviors

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 100-2811-B-006-037, NSC 97-2320-B-006-005-MY2, NSC 98-2627-B-006-010-MY3, NSC 99-2320-B-006-030-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cytoskeleton, which is the major mechanical component of cells, supports the cell body and regulates the cellular motility to assist the cell in performing its biological functions. Several cytoskeletal network models have been proposed to investigate the mechanical properties of cells. This review paper summarizes these models with a focus on the prestressed cable network, the semi-flexible chain network, the open-cell foam, the tensegrity, and the granular models. The components, material parameters, types of connection joints, tension conditions, and the advantages and disadvantages of each model are evaluated from a structural and biological point of view. The underlying mechanisms that are associated with the morphological changes of spreading cells are expected to be simulated using a cytoskeletal model; however, it is still paid less attention most likely due to the lack of a suitable cytoskeletal model that can accurately model the spreading process. In this review article, the established cytoskeletal models are hoped to provide useful information for the development of future cytoskeletal models with different degrees of cell attachment for the study of the mechanical mechanisms underlying the cellular behaviors in response to external stimulations. (C) 2012 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available