4.5 Article

Contextual dynamics in clinical workplaces: learning from doctordoctor consultations

Journal

MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 463-475

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12130

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CTI - the Swiss Confederation's Innovation Promotion Agency
  2. AMTS
  3. Agfa Healthcare
  4. University Hospital Basel
  5. Hightech Research Center of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery University of Basel
  6. University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CONTEXT Some studies have explored the role of learning context in clerkships and in clinical teams. Very little is known, however, about the relationship between context and competence development in more loosely framed, day-to-day practices such as doctordoctor consultations, although such interactions are frequent and typical in clinical work. METHODS To address this gap in the literature, a study was conducted using semi-structured interviews in four different hospitals and participant observation at one site. Inductive content analysis was used to develop a framework. Special reference was made to the principles of situated cognition. RESULTS The framework illustrates how different situational, personal and organisational factors interact in every learning situation. The interplay manifests in three different roles that doctors assume in highly dynamic ways: doctors learn as actors' (being responsible), as participants' (being involved) and as students' (being taught); contextual influences also impact on the quality of learning within these roles. CONCLUSIONS The findings add to the current literature on clinical workplace learning and to the conceptualisation of context in the field of education. The practical contribution of the research lies in disentangling the complex dynamics of learning in clinical environments and in helping doctors and medical educators to increase their responsiveness to contextual factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available