4.2 Article

Factors associated with tetanus vaccination coverage in adults in France and with knowledge of vaccination status

Journal

MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES
Volume 40, Issue 10, Pages 560-567

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.medmal.2010.03.009

Keywords

Vaccination status; Vaccination coverage; Tetanus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. - Every year, 15 to 20 tetanus cases are reported in France. The latest national figures showed that only 62 % of adults were up-to-date for this vaccination. We tried to determine the factors associated with vaccination coverage and with knowledge of vaccination status. Methods. - We analyzed data from the Sante et Protection sociale survey (2002). We analyzed the association between factors and tetanus vaccination coverage. We then explored the association between these factors and knowledge of vaccination status. Results. - Two demographic variables were only associated with vaccination coverage (higher coverage in male individuals and in individuals living in some regions of the country). Two socioeconomic variables were only associated with knowledge of vaccination status (higher knowledge in people from high income families and in managers/private professionals and in office workers). Coverage and status awareness both decreased with lower education level, in residents of large urban centers and in individuals without private medical insurance, and these two indicators were both associated to age but in an opposite direction. Conclusion. - Factors influencing vaccination coverage are rather demographic, whereas socioeconomic factors seem to influence more the knowledge of vaccination status. This distinction should help to target public health actions and adapt information for the least covered and the least informed groups. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available