4.6 Article

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Disease-Specific, Social Networking Community-Initiated Study

Journal

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
Volume 86, Issue 9, Pages 845-850

Publisher

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0312

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess the feasibility of a novel method for identification, recruitment, and retrospective and prospective evaluation of patients with rare conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This pilot study is a novel example of patient-Initiated research. After being approached by several members of an international disease-specific support group on a social networking site, we used it to identify patients who had been diagnosed as having at least 1 episode of spontaneous coronary artery dissection and recruited them to participate in a clinical investigation of their condition. Medical records were collected and reviewed, the original diagnosis was independently confirmed by review of imaging studies, and health status (both Interval and current) was assessed via specially designed questionnaires and validated assessment tools. RESULTS: Recruitment of all 12 participants was complete within 1 week of institutional review board approval (March 18, 2010). Data collection was completed November 18, 2010. All participants completed the study questionnaires and provided the required medical records and coronary anglograms and ancillary imaging data. CONCLUSION: This study involving patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection demonstrates the feasibility of and is a successful model for developing a virtual multicenter disease registry through disease-specific social media networks to better characterize an uncommon condition. This study is a prime example of patient-Initiated research that could be used by other health care professionals and Institutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available