4.6 Article

Population Screening for Barrett Esophagus: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study

Journal

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
Volume 86, Issue 12, Pages 1174-1180

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0396

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American College of Gastroenterology
  2. NIDDK [RC4DK090413]
  3. Mayo Clinic
  4. Fujinon Inc
  5. Given Imaging
  6. NIH/NCRR CTSA [UL1 RR024150]
  7. NIH [R01 AG034676]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) as alternatives to sedated endoscopy (sEGD) as screening tools for Barrett esophagus (BE) and to obtain preliminary estimates of participation rates for sEGD, uTNE, and VCE when used for community BE screening in a population cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1, 2009, to May 31, 2010, patients from Olmsted County, Minnesota, who were older than 50 years and had no history of known BE were randomized (stratified by age, sex, reflux symptoms noted in a validated questionnaire) into 3 groups for esophageal evaluation with sEGD, uTNE, or VCE. Participation rates and safety profiles were estimated. RESULTS: We contacted 127 patients to recruit 20 for each procedure arm (60 total). The probability of participation was 38% (95% confidence Interval [CI], 26%-51%) for sEGD, 50% (95% Cl, 35%-65%) for uTNE, and 59% (95% CI, 42%-74%) for VCE. Both uTNE and VCE were well tolerated without adverse effects. BE was identified in 3 patients and esophagitis in 8. CONCLUSION: Unsedated techniques may be acceptable, feasible, and safe alternatives to sEGD to screen for BE in the community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available