4.6 Article

Chronic pain, impact of pain and pain severity with physical disability in older people-Is there a gender difference?

Journal

MATURITAS
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 68-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.001

Keywords

Chronic pain; Gender; Physical disability

Funding

  1. Public Service Department (PSD) of Malaysia
  2. UMRG [397/12HTM]
  3. University of Malaya and Ministry of Higher Education (UM/MOHE) High Impact Research Grant [E000010-20001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To establish if there is any gender difference in associations between chronic pain, impact of pain and pain severity with physical disability. Methods: Data from the New South Wales Older People's Health Survey (OPHS), a population based survey of 8881 older people aged 65 years and above were used in the analysis. Chronic pain, pain with interference and pain severity and outcome variable of physical disability were all measured and determined by self report. Results: Physical disability were more frequent in respondents reporting chronic pain, pain that interferes with activities and pain that was of moderate and strong to severe severity. Chronic pain was significantly associated with physical disability among men with adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) 1.31 (95% CI 1.19, 1.43) and women with adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) 1.34(95% CI 1.28, 1.42). The relationships between pain with interference and pain severity with physical disability were similar in older men and older women. However, adjustment for psychological distress and self-rated health led to greater reductions in prevalence ratios for older men than women for all associations. Conclusion: There is no gender difference in associations between pain and physical disability among older people. However, psychological distress accounted for more pain-related physical disability in men than in women. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available