4.6 Article

Effects of nanoparticles (Cu, TiO2, Al2O3) on unsteady blood flow through a curved overlapping stenosed channel

Journal

MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 279-293

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2018.08.012

Keywords

Unsteady hemodynamics; Blood; Nanoparticles (Cu, TiO2, Al2O3); Grashof number; Curved channel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this letter, we have explored the effects of nanoparticles on unsteady pulsatile blood flow through a curved overlapping stenosed channel. The governing differential equations are derived for the given physical problem and this contains momentum and energy equations along with suitable boundary conditions. An explicit finite difference technique has been used to calculate the numerical results of the given differential equations. The numerical results for different values of curved parameter (R-c), nanoparticles (Cu, TiO2, Al2O3) and Grashof numbers (Gr) are calculated in order to analyze the effects of these parameters on blood flow pattern. A notable deviation in the results of blood flow pattern has been observed with the comparison of pure blood with nano-fluids. It is further noted that the curved parameter (R-c) of a channel has a great influence on velocity profile, flow rate and impedance/resistance to flow. It is also extracted from the velocity profiles that the shape of the velocity curves reduces to symmetric pattern for the higher values of the curved parameters (R-c). Similarly, the magnitude of temperature profiles is constricted due to the insertion of nanoparticles within blood. Moreover, streamlines are also calculated in order to analyze the effects of nanoparticles inside the circulating regions of the flow field. (C) 2018 International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (IMACS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available