4.4 Article

Joint Simulation of Grade and Rock Type in a Stratabound Copper Deposit

Journal

MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 471-495

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-014-9556-8

Keywords

Contact analysis; Multi-Gaussian model; PluriGaussian model; Joint modeling; Geological heterogeneity

Funding

  1. Chilean Commission for Scientific and Technological Research [1130085]
  2. International Association for Mathematical Geosciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work deals with the joint simulation of copper grade (as a continuous regionalized variable) and rock type (as a categorical variable) in Lince-Estefania deposit, located in northern Chile. The region under study is heterogeneous, containing three main rock types (intrusive, andesite and breccia bodies) with different copper grade distributions. To perform joint simulation, the multi-Gaussian and pluriGaussian models are used in a combined form. To this end, three auxiliary Gaussian random fields are considered, one for simulating copper grade, up to a monotonic transformation, and two for simulating rock types according to a given truncation rule. Furthermore, the dependence between copper grade and rock types is reproduced by considering cross correlations between these Gaussian random fields. To investigate the benefits of the joint simulation algorithm, copper grade and rock types are also simulated by the traditional cascade approach and the results are compared. It is shown that the cascade approach produces hard boundaries, that is, abrupt transitions of copper grades when crossing rock-type boundaries, a condition that does not exist in the study area according to the contact analysis held on the available data. In contrast, the joint simulation approach produces gradual transitions of the copper grade near the rock-type boundaries and is more suited to the actual data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available