4.5 Article

Small angle scattering methods to study porous materials under high uniaxial strain

Journal

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4908168

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) through contract MATERPRO [ANR-08-MAPR-0011]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-08-MAPR-0011] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We developed a high pressure cell for the in situ study of the porosity of solids under high uniaxial strain using neutron small angle scattering. The cell comprises a hydraulically actioned piston and a main body equipped with two single-crystal sapphire windows allowing for the neutron scattering of the sample. The sample cavity is designed to allow for a large volume variation as expected when compressing highly porous materials. We also implemented a loading protocol to adapt an existing diamond anvil cell for the study of porous materials by X-ray small angle scattering under high pressure. The two techniques are complementary as the radiation beam and the applied pressure are in one case perpendicular to each other (neutron cell) and in the other case parallel (X-ray cell). We will illustrate the use of these two techniques in the study of lamellar porous systems up to a maximum pressure of 0.1 GPa and 0.3 GPa for the neutron and X-ray cells, respectively. These devices allow obtaining information on the evolution of porosity with pressure in the pore dimension subdomain defined by the wave-numbers explored in the scattering process. The evolution with the applied load of such parameters as the fractal dimension of the pore-matrix interface or the apparent specific surface in expanded graphite and in expanded vermiculite is used to illustrate the use of the high pressure cells. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available