4.7 Article

Texture evolution and flow stress of columnar-grained polycrystalline copper during intense plastic deformation process at room temperature

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.105

Keywords

Continuous columnar grains; Texture; Stored energy; Flow stress

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2006CB605200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The texture evolution and microstructure in continuous columnar-grained (CCG) polycrystalline copper during wire drawing at room temperature were investigated quantitatively using the electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique, and the stored energy and flow stress were calculated based on the texture constitution and structural parameters of different texture components measured by high resolution EBSD. The results indicate that the development of < 1 1 1 > texture within original < 1 0 0 > columnar grains was significantly slower compared with that in equiaxed polycrystalline copper, e.g. the volumetric ratio of the < 1 1 1 > to < 1 0 0 > component in columnar-grain copper was 0.82 at the strain of 2.98, while it was 2.96 in equiaxed polycrystalline copper at the same strain. The relatively low content of < 1 1 1 > fiber texture accounted for the low flow stress, low work hardening rate and excellent cold plastic extensibility of the columnar-grained polycrystalline copper. The average size of the dislocation cells developed within the < 1 1 1 > fiber was the minimum among all the deformation texture components, and decreased rapidly with the increase of strain, leading to a high stored energy, a high flow stress and a high work hardening rate. On the other hand, the average size of the dislocation cells developed within the < 1 0 0 > fiber was the maximum, which held a large value at high strain, leading to a low stored energy, a low flow stress and a low work hardening rate. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available