4.7 Article

Comparison of the effects of La- and Ce-rich rare earth additions on the microstructure, creep resistance, and high-temperature mechanical properties of Mg-6Zn-3Cu cast alloy

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.083

Keywords

Mg-Zn-Cu alloy; Rare earth addition; Shear punch; Impression creep

Funding

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [89084/87]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of 1 wt.% La- and Ce-rich rare earth (RE) additions on the microstructure, creep resistance, and high temperature mechanical properties of the Mg-6Zn-3Cu alloy (ZC63) was investigated by impression creep and shear punch tests (SPT). Impression creep tests were performed in the temperature range 423-498 K and under punching stress in the range 150-700 MPa for dwell times up to 3600 S. The ultimate shear strength (USS) was measured by the SPT in the temperature range 298-498K. The results showed that Ce-rich RE was more effective than the La-rich RE in refining the as-cast microstructure, increasing the number density of eutectic phases at grain boundaries, and producing thermally stable Mg12RE and MgRE compounds. The creep strength of the base alloy was remarkably improved by addition of both types of RE elements, although the Ce-rich RE-containing alloy showed better creep resistance. The addition of La-rich RE increased the shear strength of the base alloy, whereas Ce-rich RE addition had detrimental effects on the shear strength. This was attributed to the formation of a grain boundary network of Mg(Zn,Cu) Laves phases in Ce-rich RE-containing alloy. This grain boundary network with a bulky morphology promoted the initiation and propagation of cracks, leading to an adverse effect on the strength. This was in contrast with its positive influence on inhibiting grain boundary sliding and migration, which enhanced the creep strength of the alloy. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available