4.7 Article

Direct observation of microfracture process in metallic-continuous-fiber-reinforced amorphous matrix composites fabricated by liquid pressing process

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.065

Keywords

Amorphous matrix composite; Continuous fiber; Liquid pressing process; Fracture toughness

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Materials Science
  2. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF), Korea, [M10400000361-06J0000-36110]
  3. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Kore [F00030492007-311006000115]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [R0A-2004-000-10361-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zr-based amorphous matrix composites reinforced with metallic continuous fibers were fabricated by liquid pressing process, and their fracture property improvement was explained by directly observing microfracture processes. About 60 vol% of metallic fibers were homogeneously distributed inside the amorphous matrix. Apparent fracture toughness of the tungsten-fiber-reinforced composites was lower than that of monolithic amorphous alloy, while that of the tantalum-fiber-reinforced composite was higher. According to the microfracture observation, shear bands or cracks were initiated at the amorphous matrix, and the propagation of the initiated shear bands or cracks was effectively blocked by fibers, thereby resulting in stable crack growth which could be confirmed by the fracture resistance curve (R-curve) behavior. This increase in fracture resistance with increasing crack length improved fracture properties of the fiber-reinforced composites, and could be explained by the formation of multiple shear bands or multiple cracks at the amorphous matrix, blocking of crack or shear band propagation, and multiple necking at metallic fibers. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available