4.6 Article

Nano-scale and micron-scale manganese dioxide vs corresponding paraffin composites for electromagnetic interference shielding and microwave absorption

Journal

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 277-286

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.12.042

Keywords

Composites; Oxides; Nanostructures; Dielectric properties; Electrical properties

Funding

  1. 973 Project [2013CB934001]
  2. NSF of China [51132002, 51172024, 51372022, 51302011]
  3. China PSF [2012M520165]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-TP-13-036A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hydrothermal method was utilized to synthesize beta-manganese dioxide (beta-MnO2) nanorods. Both the neat bulk samples fabricated from the nano-scale beta-MnO2 rods and commercial micron-scale beta-MnO2 particles exhibited similar performance in permittivity, electromagnetic interference shielding and microwave absorption. The wax-based composites embedded with the as-prepared beta-MnO2 nanorods exhibited greater differences in permittivity, electromagnetic interference shielding and microwave absorption, compared to those embedded with the commercial micron-scale MnO2 particles. The results suggest that neat MnO2 materials are effective in electromagnetic interference shielding and the composites with beta-MnO2 nanorods present the highest microwave absorption. Electrical conductivity coupled with size effects was considered as the most significant roles in the variations of permittivity, electromagnetic interference shielding and microwave absorption. The related mechanism associated with reflection and absorption has been discussed. The results have provided potential strategies for designing and achieving high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding and microwave absorbing materials. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available