4.6 Article

Preparation and characterization of the graphene-carbon nanotube/CoFe2O4/polyaniline composite with reticular branch structures

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 142, Issue 1, Pages 395-402

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.07.035

Keywords

Composite materials; Electronic materials; Magnetic materials; Polymers

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20904019, 21067004, 51273089]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [2010GZH0048]
  3. Key Laboratory of Photochemical Conversion and Optoelectronic Materials, TIPC, CSA [PCOM201228, PCOM201130]
  4. Jiangxi Province Education Department of Science and Technology Project [GJJ13491, GJJ12344]
  5. Jiangxi Province Youth Scientists Cultivating Object Program [20112BCB23017, 20122BCB23015]
  6. Aviation Science Fund [2011ZF56015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel graphene-carbon nanotube (graphene-CNT)/CoFe2O4/polyaniline composite with reticular branch structures had been fabricated by in situ chemical polymerization method. The textured structures of the as-prepared composites were characterized by the fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Xray diffraction (XRD). The morphology was analyzed by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The electromagnetic properties were tested by vibrating sample magnetometer and four-probe conductivity tester. The results showed that the graphene-CNT/CoFe2O4/polyaniline composite had the unique reticular branch structures. When the mass ratio of the graphene-CNT/CoFe2O4 to aniline was 1:3, the magnetic saturation value of the composite achieved 39.6 emu g(-1), and the conductivity reached 1.957 S cm(-1). Based on the experimental results, a probable formation mechanism for the unique reticular branch structures was proposed. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available