4.3 Article

Reinterpretation of two diatom species from the West Greenland margin - Thalassiosira kushirensis and Thalassiosira antarctica var. borealis - hydrological consequences

Journal

MARINE MICROPALEONTOLOGY
Volume 88-89, Issue -, Pages 1-14

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2012.02.004

Keywords

diatoms; Thalassiosira; hydrology; Arctic spring bloom; West Greenland Current; paleo-reconstructions

Categories

Funding

  1. DFG [Mo1422/2-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two representatives of the planktonic diatom genus Thalassiosira, commonly associated together in the moderate to high latitude North Atlantic Ocean, are demonstrated to be significantly different in both morphology and autecology. Thalassiosira antarctica Comber var. borealis Fryxell. Doucette et Hubbard (mostly resting spores) is a dominant species of the early spring phytoplankton bloom around Greenland and in the Arctic. In most paleoclimatic/paleoenvironmental studies of the last decades, Thalassiosira kushirensis Takano resting spores (r.s.) have probably been included in T. antarctica var. borealis. The present study of phytoplankton (from CTD probes and a single surface sediment sample, from a multi core) and comparative analyses of piston cores from the West Greenland margin show these taxa to be good indicators of environmental and hydrological changes related to the distribution of water masses in the studied area. T. antarctica var. borealis is interpreted as an indicator of northern cold water influx (especially increased meltwater input during spring bloom), whereas T. kushirensis r.s. appears to be related to temperate waters of Atlantic origin, and probably reflects reduced meltwater influx and increased ocean forcing. An abundance of T. kushirensis r.s. during the Little Ice Age (LIA) is interpreted to reflect an enhanced influence of the West Greenland Current (WGC) in this region. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available