4.7 Article

Benthic fluxes of copper, complexing ligands and thiol compounds in shallow lagoon waters

Journal

MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 17-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.07.010

Keywords

Heavy metals; Speciation; Ligands; Thiols; Benthic flux; Salt marsh; Venice lagoon

Funding

  1. Consortium for Coordination of Research Activities
  2. Chapman by the Leverhulme Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Benthic fluxes of copper, copper complexing ligands and thiol compounds in the shallow waters of Venice Lagoon (Italy) were determined using benthic chambers and compared to porewater concentrations to confirm their origin. Benthic copper fluxes were small due to small concentration differences between the porewaters and the overlying water, and the equilibrium concentration was the same at both sites, suggesting that the sediments acted to buffer the copper concentration. Thiol fluxes were similar to 10 x greater at 50-60 pmol cm(-2) h(-1), at the two sites. Porewater measurements demonstrated that the sediments were an important source of the thiols to the overlying waters. The overlying waters were found to contain at least two ligands, a strong one, L1 (log K'(CuL1) = 14.2) and a weaker one, L2 (log K'(CuL2) = 12.5). The concentration of L1 remained relatively constant during the incubation and similar to that of copper, whereas that of L2 was in great excess of copper, its concentration balanced by porewater releases and breakdown, probably due to uptake by microorganisms, similar to that of the thiol compounds. Similarity of the thiol and L2 concentrations and similar complex stability with copper suggest that L2 was dominated by the thiols. The free copper concentration ([Cu]) in the Lagoon waters was lowered by a factor of 105 as a result of the organic complexation. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available