4.7 Article

Copper complexation capacity in surface waters of the Venice Lagoon

Journal

MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 404-411

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.06.003

Keywords

Copper; Complexation capacity; Copper ion; Venice Lagoon; Adriatic Sea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Total copper (CUT), copper ion activity (pCu) and the copper complexation capacity (CuCC) were determined in samples of seawater collected in July 2003 from the Venice Lagoon. CUT and CUCC showed considerable spatial variability: Cu-T ranged from 1.8 to 70.0 nM, whereas the CuCC varied from 195 to 573 nM. pCu values varied from 11.6 to 12.6 and are consistent with those previously reported in estuarine and coastal areas (10.9-14.1).The range of CUT values compares well with those reported in the past in the lagoon and in the adjacent Adriatic Sea. The highest concentrations of CUT were found in samples collected near the industrial area of Porto Marghera, whereas the lowest were measured near the Chioggia and Malamocco inlets, where an intense tidally-driven renewal of seawater takes place. Although CuCC showed a high degree of spatial variability, the values recorded in the Venice Lagoon are comparable to those reported in other estuarine systems. In addition, CuCC was positively correlated with dissolved organic carbon (DOC), suggesting that organic ligands responsible for Cu complexation are part of the bulk organic matter pool in the lagoon. The CUCC:CUT molar ratio was, on average 55: 1, indicating that a large excess of complexation capacity exists in the Venice Lagoon. The high levels of CuCC and the narrow range of pCu indicates the importance of the role played by organic ligands in controlling the free ion Cu concentrations in the lagoon, and as a consequence, regulating its availability and/or toxicity. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available