4.7 Article

Evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion of spent brewery grains and an azo dye

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 489-496

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.053

Keywords

Spent brewery grains; Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Biodegradation; Dyes

Funding

  1. FEDER
  2. Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade-COMPETE
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) - Portugal [PEst-OE/CTM/UI0195/2011]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PEst-OE/CTM/UI0195/2011] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaerobic batch biodegradation of spent brewery grains (SBG) was investigated in the presence of co-substrates and a monoazo dye (Acid Orange 7 - AO7) under mesophilic and thermophilic regimes. The highest values for the yield coefficient of biogas (STP) on substrate (Y-bs) were obtained under mesophilic conditions (0381-0.516 L-biogas/g CODremoved and 0.147 to 0.475 L-biogas/g CODremoved for mesophilic and thermophilic regimes, respectively). A stimulation of the degradation of SBG associated with microbial growth was observed in the presence of co-substrates (glucose and acetate). Supplemented co-substrates also lowered the residual COD leading to an increase in the COD removal efficiency, particularly under thermophilic regime (from 41% to 70%). Although biogas yield (Y-bs) indicates a decrease in the presence of the dye, suggesting that it has inhibitory effects, the overall COD removal was not significantly altered. An increase of colour removal was observed when the temperature of the operation was increased (87 +/- 2% and 93 +/- 1% for mesophilic and thermophilic reactors, respectively), which could be explained by both faster adsorption and biotic reductive cleavage of azo dye bond mechanisms. These results indicate that raw SBG is more prone to biodegradation under an anaerobic mesophilic regime; hence its bio-energetic valorisation is possible. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available