4.2 Article

Plant nitrogen dynamics in fertilized and natural New England salt marshes: a paired N-15 tracer study

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 354, Issue -, Pages 35-46

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps07170

Keywords

Spartina alterniflora; Spartina patens; plant ecophysiology; eutrophication; nitrogen isotopes; nitrogen cycling; marsh ecosystem

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the effects of increased nutrient availability on nitrogen (N) dynamics in dominant New England salt marsh plants (tall and stunted Spartina alterniflora and S. patens) using paired large-scale nutrient and (NO3-)-N-15 tracer additions. This study is one component of a long-term, large-scale, salt marsh nutrient and trophic manipulation study (the Trophic Cascades and Interacting Control Processes in a Detritus-based Aquatic Ecosystem [TIDE] Project). We compared physiological variables of plants in fertilized (similar to 17x ambient N and P in incoming tidal water) and reference marsh systems to quantify NO3- uptake and uptake efficiency, allocation of N to tissues, end-of-season N resorption, leaf litter quality and other potential responses to increased nutrient availability. Reference system plants sequestered similar to 24.5 g NO3-N ha(-1) d(-1) in aboveground pools during midsummer, while fertilized plants sequestered similar to 140 g NO3-N ha(-1) d(-1). However, NO3- uptake efficiency (% of total incoming NO3-N sequestered aboveground) was higher in the reference system (16.8%) than in the fertilized system (2.6%), suggesting that our fertilization rate (similar to 70 mu M NO3- in incoming water) approaches or exceeds the uptake saturation point for this vegetation community. Leaf litter quality was clearly affected by N availability; N resorption efficiency was lower in all plants of the fertilized system; senesced leaves from the fertilized creek contained similar to 43% (tall S. alterniflora), 23 % (stunted S. alterniflora) and 15% (S. patens) more N per unit biomass than reference creek leaves.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available