4.7 Article

An assessment of wind power potential along the coast of Tamaulipas, northeastern Mexico

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 295-305

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.007

Keywords

Wind power potential; Tamaulipas State; Northeastern Mexico; Wind Atlas Analysis and Application; Program; Reanalysis wind product

Funding

  1. Mexico's CONACYT
  2. CICESE's internal project [625118]
  3. [CONACYT CB-2009-128940-F]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, we present an assessment of wind power potential along the coast of Tamaulipas, northeastern Mexico. We propose a method to characterize wind variability and to estimate wind potential in coastal areas where appropriate meteorological measurements may not be available. A gridded reanalysis wind product (BMW-CERSAT), which provides data of zonal and meridional components of wind with a resolution of 1/4 degrees (similar to 25 km) from years 2004-2009, is used as the reference wind field after a statistical comparison to near-surface observations. Mean wind intensity field at 50-m height and its corresponding mean power density are modeled by using the Wind Atlas Analysis and Application Program (WAsP). The wind power potential of the southern half of Tamaulipas State is classified as poor (200-300 W m(-2)), becoming marginal in some areas near the coast. Only the northern half of the State is classified with moderate potential (400-500 W m(-2)), while the lagoon zone has good potential. Estimates, however, could be 30-50% higher if wind observations are measured at a higher frequency. Results show that the wind potential along Tamaulipas is lower than that suggested by the official prevailing eolic-potential map in Mexico. We conclude that even if the assessment presented in this work is preliminary, it gives a realistic approximation of wind as a promising renewable source for electric generation along the coast of Tamaulipas. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available