4.1 Article

Evaluating the potential of 18S rDNA clone libraries to complement pyrosequencing data of marine protists with near full-length sequence information

Journal

MARINE BIOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages 771-780

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/17451000.2013.852685

Keywords

18S rDNA near full-length clones; genetic diversity; polar regions

Funding

  1. Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association [VH-NG-500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sequencing of 18S rDNA clone libraries and 454-pyrosequencing are valuable methods used to describe microbial diversity. The massively parallel 454-pyrosequencing generates vast amounts of ribosomal sequence data and has the potential to uncover more organisms, even rare species. However, the relatively short sequence lengths of approximate to 500 bp are suboptimal for taxonomic annotation and phylogenetic analyses. In this study, we assessed the potential of 18S ribosomal clone libraries to complement corresponding 454-pyrosequencing data with near full-length sequence information. This involved a comparison of protist community compositions in five polar samples suggested by 18S rDNA clone libraries, with the corresponding community compositions suggested by 454-pyrosequencing. The study was conducted with four Arctic water samples, focusing on the eukaryotic picoplankton (0.4-3 mu m), and with one sample collected in the Southern Ocean, examining the entire size spectrum (> 0.4 mu m). For all individual samples, the protist community compositions suggested by the two different approaches showed significant similarities. Around 70% of the sequences detected by sequencing of clone libraries were also present in the 454-pyrosequencing data set. However, the clone library sequences reflected only approximate to 20% of the abundant biosphere identified by 454-pyrosequencing and identified ribosomal sequences that were not detected in the 454-pyrosequencing data sets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available