Journal
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 899-917Publisher
INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1603
Keywords
game theory; add-on pricing; vertical differentiation; bounded rationality
Funding
- Michael G. Foster Faculty Fellowship
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper uses an analytical model to examine the consequences of add-on pricing when firms are both horizontally and vertically differentiated and there is a segment of boundedly rational consumers who are unaware of the add-on fees at the time of initial purchase. We find that consumers who know the add-on fees can be penalized-and increasingly so-by the existence of boundedly rational consumers. Our consideration of quality asymmetries on base goods and add-ons, plus the inclusion of boundedly rational consumers, leads to several novel findings regarding firm profits. When quality asymmetry is on base goods only and with boundedly rational consumers, add-on pricing can diminish profit for a qualitatively superior firm and increase profit for an inferior firm (i.e., a lose-win result), compared to when add-on pricing is prohibited or infeasible. When quality asymmetries exist on both base goods and add-ons and without boundedly rational consumers, the opposite win-lose result prevails. When quality asymmetries exist on both base goods and add-ons and with boundedly rational consumers, the result can be win-win, win-lose, or lose-win, depending on the magnitude of quality differentiation on add-ons.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available