4.7 Article

Three-Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, Human Resource Analytics, and Information Technology

Journal

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 913-931

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1460

Keywords

incentive systems; information technology; performance pay; human resource analytics; complementarity; enterprise systems; ERP; productivity; production function; principal-agent model

Funding

  1. SAP
  2. Center for Digital Business at MIT
  3. Microsoft Research
  4. National Science Foundation [0953832]
  5. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0953832] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We test for three-way complementarities among information technology (IT), performance pay, and human resource (HR) analytics practices. We develop a principal-agent model examining how these practices work together as an incentive system that produces a larger productivity premium when the practices are implemented in concert rather than separately. We assess our model by combining fine-grained data on human capital management (HCM) software adoption over 11 years with detailed survey data on incentive systems and HR analytics practices for 189 firms. We find that the adoption of HCM software is greatest in firms that have also adopted performance pay and HR analytics practices. Furthermore, HCM adoption is associated with a large productivity premium when it is implemented as a system of organizational incentives, but has less benefit when adopted in isolation. The system of three-way complements produces disproportionately greater benefits than pairwise interactions, highlighting the importance of including all three complements. Productivity increases significantly when the HCM systems go live but not when they are purchased, which can be years earlier. This helps rule out reverse causality as an explanation for our findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available