4.5 Article

Assessment of altered three-dimensional blood characteristics in aortic disease by velocity distribution analysis

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 817-825

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25466

Keywords

4D flow MRI; aortic dilation

Funding

  1. NIH [R01HL115828, K25HL119608]
  2. AHA [13SDG14360004, 14POST18350019]
  3. CONACyT [203355]
  4. SIR Pilot Study grant
  5. DFG [SCHN 1170/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo test the feasibility of velocity distribution analysis for identifying altered three-dimensional (3D) flow characteristics in patients with aortic disease based on 4D flow MRI volumetric analysis. MethodsForty patients with aortic (Ao) dilation (mid ascending aortic diameter MAA=407 mm, age=5617 years, 11 females) underwent cardiovascular MRI. Four groups were retrospectively defined: mild Ao dilation (n=10; MAA<35 mm); moderate Ao dilation (n=10; 35<45 mm); severe Ao dilation (n=10; MAA>45 mm); Ao dilation+aortic stenosis AS (n=10; MAA>35 mm and peak velocity>2.5 m/s). The 3D PC-MR angiograms were computed and used to obtain a 3D segmentation of the aorta which was divided into four segments: root, ascending aorta, arch, descending aorta. Radial chart displays were used to visualize multiple parameters representing segmental changes in the 3D velocity distribution associated with aortic disease. ResultsChanges in the velocity field and geometry between cohorts resulted in distinct hemodynamic patterns for each aortic segment. Disease progression from mild to Ao dilation+AS resulted in significant differences (P<0.05) in flow parameters across cohorts and increased radial chart size for root and ascending aorta segments by 146% and 99%, respectively. ConclusionVolumetric 4D velocity distribution analysis has the potential to identify characteristic changes in regional blood flow patterns in patients with aortic disease. Magn Reson Med 74:817-825, 2015. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available