4.5 Article

In Vivo Detection of Citrate in Brain Tumors by 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 3T

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 316-323

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24946

Keywords

citrate; gliomas; adults; H-1 MRS; 3T; PRESS (point-resolved spectroscopy); density-matrix simulation

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R21CA159128, R01CA154843]
  2. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [RP101243-P04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To test whether citrate is elevated in adult patients with gliomas using H-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 3T in vivo. Methods: Thirty-four adult patients were enrolled in the study, including six subjects with glioblastomas, eight subjects with astrocytomas (World Health Organization grade 3, n = 5; grade 2, n=3), and 20 subjects with oligodendrogliomas (grade 3, n=5; grade 2, n=15). Five healthy volunteers were studied for baseline citrate data. Single-voxel localized spectra were collected with point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) echo times of 35 and 97 ms and were analyzed with LCModel software using numerically calculated basis spectra that included the effects of the PRESS radiofrequency and gradient pulses. Results: Citrate was not measurable by MRS in healthy brain but was detected in tumor patients at both echo times. The citrate concentration was estimated to be as high as 1.8 mM with reference to water at 42 M, with Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) as low as 5%. The mean citrate level was 0.7 +/- 0.4 mM (mean +/- SD, n 32) with a median CRLB of similar to 12%. No correlation was identified between citrate concentration and tumor grade or histological type. Conclusion: Citrate was increased in the majority of gliomas in adult patients. The elevated citrate in our data indicates an altered metabolic state of tumor relative to healthy brain. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available