4.7 Article

Evaluation of field-measured vertical obscuration and full waveform lidar to assess salt marsh vegetation biophysical parameters

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 264-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.035

Keywords

Remote sensing; Lidar; Salt marsh; Coastal vegetation; Full-waveform; Spartina alterniflora; Biomass

Funding

  1. UNH/NOAA Joint Hydrographic Center [NA10NOS4000073]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences [1339015] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Local, high-resolution, accurate data sets are needed to support restoration and other management initiatives in coastal salt marshes, yet field collections of site-specific vegetation data is often impractical. In this study, a novel combination of full-waveform light detection and ranging (lidar) and field techniques for assessing the distribution of aboveground biomass throughout its height and its light blocking properties were investigated. Using new field methods, strong correlations were observed (r > 0.9) between subsamples' vertical biomass (VB), the distribution of vegetation biomass by height, and vertical obscuration (VO), the measure of the vertical distribution of the ratio of vegetation to airspace, for Spartina alterniflora. Also, it was found that simple metrics derived from the lidar waveforms, such as waveform width, can provide new information to estimate salt marsh vegetation parameters. The strong correlations between field-collected biophysical parameters and metrics derived from lidar data suggest that remote sensing methods can be used to estimate some vegetation biophysical parameters such as plant height and proportion of vegetation area (PVA) using smaller, more targeted field surveys. Future work will be needed to verify the extensibility of the methods to other sites and vegetation types. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available