4.5 Article

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Novel Approach to Investigate Intramyocellular Lipids

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 937-944

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23121

Keywords

intramyocellular lipids; extramyocellular lipids; diffusion; skeletal muscle; IMCL; MRS

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council [HKU7826/10M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by the potential difference between intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) and extramyocellular lipid (EMCL) in their microscopically restricted diffusion environments, proton diffusion properties in IMCL and EMCL were characterized by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Ex vivo experiments were conducted on fresh pig lower hindlimb muscle samples. In vivo experiments were performed on the lower hindlimbs of normal adult Sprague-Dawley rats. Ex vivo apparent diffusion coefficients at 20 degrees C were found to be in the ranges of (10.8 +/- 0.5) x 10(-6) to (15.8 +/- 0.8) x 10(-6) mm(2)/s for EMCL and (1.6 +/- 0.6) x 10(-6) to (2.4 +/- 0.7) x 10(-6) mm(2)/s for IMCL depending on the diffusion weighting direction relative to muscle fiber orientation. In vivo apparent diffusion coefficients of EMCL and IMCL were measured as (13.8 +/- 0.9) x 10(-6) and (4.6 +/- 0.7) x 10(-6) mm(2)/s, respectively, along the direction perpendicular to muscle fiber orientation. Our results demonstrated that the apparent diffusion coefficient of EMCL was substantially higher than that of IMCL. Therefore, EMCL could be effectively suppressed by proper diffusion weighting to achieve reliable detection of IMCL despite unknown or/and multiple muscle fiber orientations. Such lipid proton diffusion approach can be used for robust IMCL separation and identification. Furthermore, it may provide new biophysical insights in the investigation of lipid metabolism in obesity and diabetes. Magn Reson Med 66: 937-944, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available