4.5 Article

Fast Functional Brain Imaging Using Constrained Reconstruction Based on Regularization Using Arbitrary Projections

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 394-405

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22009

Keywords

FMRI; MREG; inverse imaging; radial; parallel imaging; undersampled; regularization

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [13N9208]
  2. Hertie Foundation [1.02.1/04/006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work describes a novel method for highly undersampled projection imaging using constrained reconstruction by Tikhonov-Phillips regularization and its application for high temporal resolution functional MRI (fMRI) at a repetition time of 80 ms. The high-resolution reference image used as in vivo coil sensitivity is acquired in a separate acquisition using otherwise identical parameters. Activation studies using a standard checkerboard activation paradigm demonstrate the inherent high sensitivity afforded by the possibility to separate activation-related effects from physiological noise.. In this first proof-of-principle of the constrained reconstruction based on regularization using arbitrary projections (COBRA) technique, experiments are performed in a single-slice mode, which allows for a comparison with fast single-slice echo-planar imaging (EPI) at equal temporal resolution. The COBRA method can be extended to three-dimensional (3D) encoding without severe penalty in temporal performance. Analysis of the global signal change demonstrates the excellent reproducibility of COBRA compared to standard EPI. Activation analysis is considerably improved by the possibility to remove electrocardiogram (ECG)related and breathing-related signal fluctuations by physiological correction of each individual breathing and ECG cycle, respectively. Magn Reson Med 62:394-405, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available