4.4 Article

Computerized MRS voxel registration and partial volume effects in single voxel 1H-MRS

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 1197-1205

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.04.001

Keywords

(HMRS)-H-1; Partial volume effects; Image reconstruction

Funding

  1. Translational Research Opportunity Grant from the School of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Partial volume effects in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the brain have been studied previously in terms of proper water concentration calculations, but there is a lack of disclosure in terms of voxel placement techniques that would affect the calculations. The purpose of this study is to facilitate a fully automated MRS voxel registration method which is time efficient, accurate, and can be extended to all imaging modalities. A total of thirteen healthy adults underwent single voxel 1H-MRS scans in 3.0 T MRI scanners. Transposition of a MRS voxel onto an anatomical scan is derived along with a full calculation of water concentration with a correction term to account for the partial volume effects. Five metabolites (tNAA, Glx, tCr, ml, and tCho) known to yield high reliability are studied. Pearson's correlation analyses between tissue volume fractions and metabolite concentrations were statistically significant in parietal (tCr, Glx, and tNAA) lobe and occipital lobe (tNAA). MRS voxel overlaps quantified by dice metric over repeated visits yielded 60% similar to 70% and coefficients of variance in metabolites concentration were 4% similar to 10%. These findings reiterate an importance of considering the partial volume effects when tissue water is used as an internal concentration reference so as to avoid misinterpreting a morphometric difference as a metabolic difference. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available