4.7 Article

Mechanical consequences of molecular composition on failure in polyolefin composites containing glassy, elastomeric, and semicrystalline components

Journal

MACROMOLECULES
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 1341-1351

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma071196r

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to gain insights into the mechanisms of deformation and ultimate failure in a homologous series of lamellae-forming polyolefin block copolymers comprised of glassy poly(cyclohexylethylene) (C), elastomeric poly(ethylene-alt-propylene) (P), and semicrystalline poly(ethylene) (E), the anisotropic tensile properties of samples in which the microphase separate structure is oriented on a macroscopic length scale were probed. Reciprocating shear processing of monodisperse CPCPC and CPEPC-xi polymers having mass fraction w(C) similar to 0.39-0.44 and 0 <= xi <= 1, where xi = w(E)/(w(E) + w(P)), produces single-grain polymer samples with perpendicular-oriented lamellae. Tensile deformation studies in which the strain axis coincides with the lamellar normal direction yield varied mechanical responses ranging from brittle fracture for CEC (xi = 0) to ductile behavior for CPEPC (xi > 0) and CPCPC. Tandem small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering analysis of samples undergoing deformation shows that application of strain along the lamellar normal in the CPEPC materials results in formation of a folded lamellar structure or chevron morpohology within which the E crystals cant relative to the strain direction. Since the ultimate failure mechanism for materials strained in this direction is chain pullout in the glassy domains, a simple mechanical model applied to the data enables quantitation of the stress required for chain pullout at similar to 4 MPa. Additionally, the mechanical properties of miscible blends of CEC and CPC polymers with matched segregation strengths are shown to mimic those of the covalently linked CPEPC pentablock copolymer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available