4.5 Article

Expression of Bcl-2 predicts outcome in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 288-294

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.06.003

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); Bcl-2; Chemoradiotherapy; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard treatment for locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The determination of parameters that may predict the result of the treatment has strong clinical implications. Patients and methods: Pretreatment tumor biopsy specimens from 39 patients with locally advanced NSCLC (stage IIIA: 5, stage IIIB: 34) were analyzed for p53,Bcl-2, Bax and ERCC1 expression by immunohistochemistry. All patients were treated with cis platin-based CCRT. Twenty-four patients received induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT (60 Gy/30 fractions, 6 mg/m(2) of cisplatin daily). The most commonly administered induction chemotherapy regimen was VIP (etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin; 20 patients). Fifteen patients received the same CCRT without induction chemotherapy. Results: High expression of p53, Bcl-2, Bax and ERCC1 was observed in 15 (38%), 19 (49%), 17 (44%) and 12(31%) patients, respectively. High expression of Bcl-2 was significantly associated with longer survival duration (20 months vs. 9 months, P=0.008) and better response to the treatment (74% vs. 30%, P=0.01). In multivariate analysis, Bcl-2 expression was the only significant independent prognostic factor of overall survival (P=0.007) among the pretreatment patients characteristics. Conclusions: High expression of Bcl-2 may be a useful prognostic factor in locally advanced NSCLC patients treated with cisplatin-based CCRT. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available