4.5 Article

Combined genetic analysis of sputum and computed tomography for noninvasive diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 58-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.01.004

Keywords

Genetic analysis; Sputum; CT; Lung cancer; Diagnosis

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [CA-135382, CA-137742, CA-133956]
  2. Wendy Will Case Cancer Award
  3. University of Maryland Statewide Health Network
  4. American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant
  5. NCI-The Early Detection Research Network
  6. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CT plays an important role in diagnosis of lung cancer, however has been limited by uncertain detection rate for early stage of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly central tumors. Genetic analysis of sputum has proven to be useful in diagnosis of NSCLC. We proposed to evaluate efficacy of combing CT and genetic analysis of sputum for noninvasive diagnosis of stage I NSCLC. Genomic copy changes of a panel of lung cancer-related genes, HYAL2, FHIT, p76, and SP-A were analyzed by a mini-chip in sputum from 33 patients with stage I NSCLC and 49 cancer-free controls. The genetic and CT diagnoses were compared with surgical-pathologic stage. CT had higher sensitivity (85%) in detection of lung cancer compared with the mini-chip (70%) (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in specificity between the two tests (89% vs. 92%, p = 0.09). Similarly, CT showed considerably higher sensitivity (93%) in identifying peripheral tumors than did the mini-chip (64%) (p < 0.05), whereas there was no difference in specificity between them (98% vs. 96%, p = 0.28). However, in detecting central tumors, CT had lower specificity (90%) compared with the mini-chip (98%) (p < 0.05), although its sensitivity (79%) was higher than that of the mini-chip (73%) (p = 0.05). Combining both tests offered higher sensitivity (91%) than did any single one (85%, 70%, all <0.05), while still keeping 92% sensitivity. In particular, this combined approach yielded higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing central cancers compared with CT alone (all p < 0.05). The integration of the genetic assay with CT led to improvements in noninvasive diagnosis of stage I NSCLCs, especially central tumors. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available